Balancing maker v manager needs

heleadethme

New member
I love building things. The act of turning an idea into a tangible item is magical. Building walls. Making a table with a chess board inlay. Designing a logo. Developing a financial model. Coding a mobile app. The creative process brings me great pleasure. Almost without exception, the things I am most proud of have taken dedicated effort, over a sustained period. Days when I have stretches of quiet, uninterrupted time are the most productive and enjoyable. Conversely, those interspersed with meetings, urgent emails and quick questions are often unproductive and frustrating.

Makers v managers work patterns​


The ability to perform deep work is becoming increasingly rare at exactly the same time it is becoming increasingly valuable in our economy. - Cal Newport

The tension between the manager's and maker's needs represents a profound challenge in most organisations. This primarily negatively impacts people in creative and technical roles. The manager's schedule divides into one-hour intervals, conducive to meetings and decision-making. This suits the dynamic nature of managerial tasks that require frequent context switching. In contrast, maker's require prolonged, undisturbed periods to focus. This is essential for deep concentration and engagement in complex creative or problem-solving tasks. Makers, like programmers and writers, thrive on this schedule as it fosters a state of flow, crucial for innovation and quality output.

Conflict awareness​


All truths that are kept silent become poisonous. - Friedrich Nietzsche

Conflict arises when the segmented nature of the manager's schedule interrupts the maker's need for extended focus. Meetings and adhoc requests for updates are significant disruptors. Such interruptions not only fragment the maker's day but also impose a cognitive cost, affecting productivity and the ability to engage deeply with work. The issue extends beyond individual inconvenience, reflecting a broader organisational challenge where the prevailing rhythm, often dictated by management, fails to accommodate the needs of makers.

Accommodating maker needs​


A woodpecker can tap twenty times on a thousand trees and get nowhere, but stay busy. Or he can tap twenty-thousand times on one tree and get dinner. - Seth Godin

Addressing the contrasting needs of makers and managers requires mutual understanding and respect. Strategies I find helpful include:
  1. Team member’s awareness of the importance of uninterrupted work periods.
  2. Designating specific times for meetings. This ensures the main work hours remain free for focused, creative tasks. I found steps to transform meeting effectiveness include having fewer of them, planning well and facilitating flow.
  3. Flexible working arrangements which accommodate different work rhythms. This allows me and other makers to operate during our peak productivity times, be it early morning, late night or other times.
  4. Blocking out calendar for periods to focus on specific, priority tasks.
  5. Asynchronous communication. Email and collaboration apps allow me to consider requests and respond at the most appropriate time.

Other resources​


Deep Work in 5 Steps post by Phil Martin

How to do Great Work post by Phil Martin

Cal Newport suggests, To produce at your peak level you need to work for extended periods with full concentration on a single task free from distraction.

Have fun.

Phil…
 
@heleadethme I thought I was tripping because I just read this from my email and plan to discuss it with an executive I’m consulting for. I scrolled down on this post in the comments and there is Phil. Whew I know Phil because I downloaded Substack to follow him. 😁
 

Similar threads

Back
Top